The Brondot Strategy: Achieving Victory Without Vote Buying in Indonesia’s Local Democracy

Main Article Content

Rofiq Rofiq
Nafisah Nafisah

Abstract

This study employs a qualitative method with a case study approach on village head elections in two villages in Central Java to explore the role of the brondot strategy in democratization. This strategy utilizes rewards, primordial issues, and political clientelism to establish political hegemony, aiding incumbents in winning contests and avoiding significant competition, with hopes of victory without buying votes. Brondot is closely linked to familial political networks, leveraging biological relationships for network tactic control. Family's role in political elections and generational inheritance influences this strategy. The study provides insights into local political position elections without significant expenses, relevant in Indonesia where buying votes is a common practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rofiq, R., & Nafisah, N. (2023). The Brondot Strategy: Achieving Victory Without Vote Buying in Indonesia’s Local Democracy. JRP (Jurnal Review Politik), 13(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrp.2023.13.2.179-201
Section
Articles

References

Antlöv, Hans. 2003, “Village Government and Rural Development in Indonesia: The New Democratic Fram-ework.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 39 (2).

Aspinall, Edward and Noor Rohman, 2017, Village head elections in Java: Money politics and brokerage in the remaking of Indonesia's rural elite, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), February 2017. 31 © The National University of Singapore, doi:10.1017/S¬002¬246¬3416¬000461.

Aspinall, Edward dan Berenschot Ward, 2019, Demokrasi For Sale, Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik, https://www.bps.go.id.

Benoit, Fliche, 2006, Social practices and mobilisations of kinship: an introduction, European Journal of Turkish Studies Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey.

Berenschot, Ward, 2018, The Political Economy of Clientelism: A Comparative Study of Indonesia’s Patronage. Demo¬cracy, Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Booth, David, and Diana Cammack. Governance for Deve¬lop-ment in Africa: Solving Collective Action Problems. London: Zed Books 2013.

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1972 ‘Les stratégies matrimoniales dans le système de reproduction’, Les Annales ESC 27.

Choi, Ina, and Yuki Fukuoka. 2015, “Co-Opting Good Gover-nance Reform: The Rise of a Not-SoReformist Leader in Kebumen, Central Java.” Asian Journal of Political Science 23, (1).

Gibson, Edward L, 2005, “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics 58 (1) 101–132.

Gillian P. Hart, 1986, Power, labor, and livelihood: Processes of change in rural Java (Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hadiz, Vedi. 2010, Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asian Perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hans Antlöv, 2019. ‘Village government and rural development in Indonesia : The new democratic framework’, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 39, 2 (2003).

Ito, Takeshi, 2017, Everyday Citizenship in Village Java. In Citizenship and Democratization in Southeast Asia, edited by Ward Berenschot, Hank Schulte Nordholt, and Laurens Bakker, Leiden: Brill.

Kenawas, Yoes. 2015. “The Rise of Political Dynasties in a Democratic Society.” Unpublished Paper.

Martin, Claude, 2002, Les solidarités familiales : bon ou mauvais objet sociologique? Debordeaux, Daniel; Strobel, Pierre (eds), Les solidarités familiales en questions. Entraide et transmission, Paris, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

Mcmann, Kelly. 2006, Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mendras, Henri, 2003 La seconde révolution française 1965-1984, Paris, Gallimard.

Muhtadi, Burhanudin, 2020, Kuasa Uang ; Politik Uang Dalam Pemilu Pasca Orde Baru, PT Gramedia, Jakarta.

Robinson, James A. 2013, The Political Economy of Clientelism, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, USA, Scand. J. of Economics 115(2).

Sambodho, Prio. 2019, “From Clients to Citizens? Democratization and Everyday Citizenship in a West Javanese Village.” PhD dissertation. University of Amsterdam.

Schröder, Peter, 2009, Strategi Politik, Friedrich Naumann Stiftung : Jakarta.

See, 2004, for example, Sven Cederroth, ‘Traditional power and party politics in North Lombok, 1965–1999’, in Elections in Indonesia: The New Order and beyond, ed. Hans Antlöv and Sven Cederroth (London: Routle¬d¬ge¬Curzon.

Sukarno W. Sumarto, 2021, Akuntabilitas Dana Desa, Link : http://www.bpkp.go.id/jateng/konten/3544.

Tusalem, R. F., and Pe-Aguirre, J. J. 2013. The effects of political dynasties on effective democratic governance. Asian Politics & Policy, Volume 5, Number 3.

Ward Berenschot, Wigke Capric and Devy Dhianc, 2021, A quiet revolution? Village head elections and the demo¬cratization of rural Indonesia, Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 53, No. 1, 126–146 https://doi.org/10.¬1080/14672¬715.¬2021.1871852.