Mapping the Concept of the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) on Political Studies and Public Policy
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) berupaya mendeskripsikan, menjelaskan, dan memprediksi peran narrasi dalam policy making. Tujuan penelitian ini melakukan pendekatan bibliometric untuk melihat perkembangan penelitian pada bidang Narrative Policy Framework (NPF). Data penelitian ini merupakan 125 artikel berepurtasi internasional (Scopus) pada tahun 2010 sampai 2020 dengan kata kunci Narrative Policy Framework (NPF). Indikator bibliometrik, seperti kutipan, digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi struktur tema. Analisis data dilakukan dengan perangkat lunak softwere VOSviewer dan NVivo Plus 12. Penggunaan VOSviewer untuk memetakan tren tema utama di area penelitian dan dapat menemukan literature baru. Kemudian melakukan project map tema besar artikel penelitian Narrative Policy Framework dengan perangkat lunak softwere Nvivo Plus 12. Hasil analisis, penulis, lembaga, dan kata kunci menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Studi penelitian Narrative Policy Framework memiliki tren perkembangan jumlah publikasi sangat fluktuatif pada sepuluh tahun terkahir; (2) United States memiliki kontribusi tinggi dalam publikasi penelitian topik ini; (3) tidak adanya dominasi penulis tunggal yang siginifikan: (4) Studi Narrative Policy Framework berdasarkan analisis jaringan, menunujukan empat tema besar yang menjadi konsen author, Policy, Narrative, Politik. Narrative Policy Framework memiliki peran dalam melihat struktur narasi, ideologi narasi dan gap narasi antar aktor, sehingga kondisi tersebut dapat membuat analisis kebijakan publik semakin komperhensif.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Leech, B. L., & Kimball, D. C. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. University of Chicago Press.
Bedsworth, L. W., Lowenthal, M. D., & Kastenberg, W. E. (2004). Uncertainty and regulation: The rhetoric of risk in the California low-level radioactive waste debate. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(3), 406-427
Blair, B. D., & McCormack, L. (2016). Applying the narrative policy framework to the issues surrounding hydraulic fracturing within the news media: A research note. Research & Politics, 3(1), 2053168016628334.
Clemons, R. S., McBeth, M. K., Peterson, R. D., & Palmer, C. L. (2020). The narrative policy framework and sticky beliefs: an experiment studying islamophobia. International journal on minority and group rights, 27(3), 472-500.
Crow, D., & Jones, M. (2018). Narratives as tools for influencing policy change. Policy & Politics, 46(2), 217-234.
Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Jones, P. R. (2009). Public finance and public choice: analytical perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2017). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. Theories of the policy process, 4, 135-172.
Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong?. Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329-353.
Jones, M., Shanahan, E., & McBeth, M. (Eds.). (2014). The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework in public policy analysis. Springer.
Kingdon, J.W., 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies seconded. Longman, New York.
McBeth, M. K., Jones, M. D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2014). The narrative policy framework. Theories of the policy process, 3, 225-266.
McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Jones, M. D. (2005). The science of story-telling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources, 18(5), 413-429.
Ostrom, E. (1999). Institutional rational choice. Theories of the policy process, 35-72.
Sabatier, Paul A. "The need for better theories." Theories of the policy process 2 (1999): 3-17.
Scott, I. A., Scuffham, P., Gupta, D., Harch, T. M., Borchi, J., & Richards, B. (2018). Going digital: a narrative overview of the effects, quality and utility of mobile apps in chronic disease self-management. Australian Health Review, 44(1), 62-82.
Secko, D. M., Tlalka, S., Dunlop, M., Kingdon, A., & Amend, E. (2011). The unfinished science story: Journalist–audience interactions from the Globe and Mail’s online health and science sections. Journalism, 12(7), 814-831.
Shanahan, D., Cowie, R., Rogers, H., & Staines, K. (2018). Oral hairy leukoplakia in healthy immunocompetent patients: a small case series. Oral and Maxil-lofacial Surgery, 22(3), 335-339.
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535-561.
Shanahan, Elizabeth A., Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, and Ross R. Lane. "An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities." Policy Studies Journal 41, no. 3 (2013): 453-483.
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge university press.