Kritik Pemikiran Khalifah Hizbut Tahrir yang Autokratik
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The proponents of Hizbut Tahrir (HT) claim that the structure of HT’s political system has been the sole best system, and it is deemed as a single compatible system to deal with all problems faced by the modern people in this modern age. The political system has been claimed as being capable of replacing all existing political systems in the world nowadays. They call this political system khilāfah coupled with khalīfah as the central elements. To the proponents of HT, the khilāfah system they promulgate among the Islamic communities throughout the world has been a legacy of the Prophet Muhammad. Therefore, the Muslim communities have to uphold this system regardless of their geographical boundaries. This article seeks to track roots of thought, which provide the political system called khilāfah and khalīfah propagated by HT foundation for its existence. In doing so, I will refer to authoritative references written and published by the proponents of HT. The study finds that the model of election, appointment, impeachment, and power of khalīfah along with obedience upon him, leads to autocratic governance.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing
© The Author(s). Published by Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya, Indonesia.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
References
al-Amin, Ainur Rofiq. “Demokrasi Perspektif Hizbut Tahrir versus Religious Mardomsalari ala Muslim Iran,” Islamika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Vol. 8, No. 1. September-2013.
-----. “Dilema Konseptual Khilafah HTI: Sebuah Ketergesaan Kesimpulan”, Bayan, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2012.
-----. “Transmutation of Idelogy Gerakan Hizbut Tahrir,” Akademika, Vol. 16 No. 2, Maret-2005.
Al-Jawi, M. Shiddiq. “Akuntabilitas dalam Negara Khilafah”, al-Wa’ie, No. 94, tahun VIII, Juni 2008.
Anis, Muhammad. Islam dan Demokrasi: Perspektif Wilayah al-Faqih. Jakarta: Mizan, 2013.
An-Nabhani, Taqiuddin. The Islamic State. London: al-Khilafah Publications, 1998.
-----. The System of Islam. London: Al-Khilafah Publications, 2002.
Asad, Muhammad. The Principles of State and Government in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, t.th.
Esposito, John L. (ed.). Political Islam: Revolution, Radicalism, or Reform. London: Lynne Rienner Publisher, 1997.
Dīnawarī (al), Ibn Qutaybah. al-Imāmah wa al-Siyāsah, Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah, 2001.
Hanafi, Hasan. “Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society: A Reflective Islamic Approach,” dalam ed. Sohail H. Hashmi (ed.), Islamic Political Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
Hararī (al), ‘Abd Allāh.Idhhār al-‘Aqīdah al-Sunnīyah bi Sharḥ al-‘Aqīdah al-Ṭaḥāwīyah. Beirut: Dār al-Mashāri‘, 1997.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocracy (22 September 2018).
Indonesia, Hizbut Tahrir, Manifesto Hizbut Tahrir untuk Indonesia. Jakarta: HTI, 2009.
Kansil, C.S.T. Ilmu Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1992.
Khālidī (al), Maḥmūd ‘Abd al-Majīd. Qawāid Niẓām al-Ḥukm fī al-Islām. Beirut: Dār al-Buḥūth al-‘Ilmīyah, 1980.
Khomayni, Imam. Sistem Pemerintahan Islam, terj. Muhammad Anis Maulachela. Jakarta: Pustaka Zahra, 2002.
Kompas, 8 Maret 2005 halaman 33.
Kurnia, MR. “Urgensi dan Kewajiban Menaati Amir,” al-Waie, No. 99 tahun IX, November, 2008.
Mahajan, V.D. Political Theory. New Delhi: S. Chand dan Company ltd, 2003.
Mallat, Chibli. Menyegarkan Islam, terj. Santi Indra Astuti. Bandung: Mizan, 2001.
Nabhānī (al), Taqī al-Dīn. al-Shakhṣīyah al-Islāmīyah, Vol. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Ummah, 2003.
-----. Mafāhim Ḥizb al-Taḥrīr. t.t.: Ḥizb al-Taḥrīr, 1953.
-----. Mīthāq al-Ummah (t.t.: Ḥizb al-Taḥrīr, t.th.
-----. Muqaddimat al-Dustūr. Beirut: t.tp., 1963.
-----. Niẓām al-Islām. Beirut: Dār al-Ummah, 2001), 95.
Paydar, Manouchehr. Legitimasi Negara Islam, terj. M. Maufur el-Khoiry. Yogyakarta: Fajar Pustaka Baru, 2003.
Richter, Melvin (ed.). Montesquieu: Selected Political Writing. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1990.
Samidjo. Ilmu Negara. Bandung: Armico, 1986.
Shāṭibī (al), Abū Isḥāq. al-Muwafaqāt, Vol. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, t.th.
Simāwī (al), Muḥammad al-Tījānī. al-Shī‘ah Hum Ahl al-Sunnah. Beirut: Muassasat al-Fajr, 1990.
Sulaimi, Ruwaifi’ bin. “Reformasi, Napak Tilas Gerakan Agen Yahudi Abdullah bin Saba’ al-Himyari”, Asy-Syari’ah, No. 60/V, 1431/2010.
Syafruddin, Abulfaruq Ayip. “Kedudukan Penguasa di dalam Syari’at,” Asy-Syari’ah, No. 60/V. 1431/2010.
Syafruddin, Abulfaruq Ayip. “Sepenggal Kisah Reformasi,” Asy-Syari’ah, No. 60/V, 1431/2010.
Ṭabarī (al), Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad b. Jarīr.Tārīkh al-Umam wa al-Mulūk, Vol. 4. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1987.
Tahrīr (al), Ḥizb. Ajhizat Dawlat al-Khilāfah. Beirut: Dār al-Ummah, 2005.
-----. al-Jihād fī al-Islām. t.t.: Ḥizb al-Taḥrīr, 2008.
-----. al-Khilāfah. t.t.: Ḥizb al-Taḥrīr, t.th.
-----. al-Khilāfah. t.t.: Ḥizb al-Taḥrīr, t.th.
-----. Muqaddimat al-Dustūr. Beirut: Dār al-Ummah, 2009.
Tansey, Stephen D. Politics: The Basics. London dan New York: Routledge, 2005.
Uwik, Gus. “Keberlangsungan Daulah Islam”, al-Wa’ie, No. 71, Tahun VI, Juli-2006.
Vincent, Andrew. Theories of State. New York: Basil Blackwell Ltd, 1987), 193.
Wadjdi, Farid. “Hanya Khilafah yang Layak Memimpin Dunia”, al-Wa’ie, No. 67 tahun VI, Maret-2006.
Yusanto, Muhammad Ismail. “ED Husain: Pengembara yang Sia-sia”, al-Wa’ie, No. 109, tahun X, September-2009.
Zallūm, ‘Abd Qadīm. Niẓām al-Ḥukm fī al-Islām. Beirut: Dār al-Ummah, 2002.