@article{Anshori_2017, title={Analisis Historis Kemunculan dan Pelembagaan Ziy?dat al-Thiqqah dalam Studi Hadis}, volume={7}, url={https://jurnalfuf.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/mutawatir/article/view/994}, DOI={10.15642/mutawatir.2017.7.2.331-351}, abstractNote={<p>This paper examines the origins of <em>ziyâdat al-thiqqah</em> and its institutionalization in hadith studies. The term of <em>ziyâdat al-thiqqah</em> was firstly initiated by al-Bukhârî in the middle age of the third century of Hijrah. At first, <em>ziyâdat al-thiqqah</em> was used to mean as adding <em>sanad</em> (chain of hadith narrators). But later, the term was also used in terms of <em>matn</em> (main text of hadith), which begins to be institutionalized in the 7th century of Hijriah. The goal of al-Bukhârî in setting up the term is to assert that the narrator should only receive the additional <em>thiqqah</em> narrators<em>.</em> This could also be a strategy of anticipation to minimize a counterfeiting of Prophet’s traditions. With the existence of <em>ziyâdat al-thiqqah</em>, it certainly brings influences on the narration of Hadith. This study finds that there are three implications of <em>ziyâdat al-thiqqah</em> in Hadith studies: the reconstruction of the theory of <em>maqbûl</em>, the acceptance of <em>ziyâdat al-thiqqah</em> as a form of variation, and the confirmation of the existence of <em>al-isnâd al-‘âlî</em> and <em>al-isnâd al-nâzil</em>.</p>}, number={2}, journal={Mutawatir : Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith}, author={Anshori, Muhammad}, year={2017}, month={Dec.}, pages={331–351} }